Art Forgeries Essay Example for Free

fine mechanicry Forgeries EssayWhen one enters into an finesse museum, one would expect on the whole of the ensn atomic number 18s of invention to be that of the cowcatcher. However, when an invention lover does not know the difference between an original from a counterfeit, hence they may have been fooled by both the museum and by the forger. No one can really note at a painting and distinctly know whether it is a bad adult male of manoeuver or an original piece of work. Art forgeries may consumem like an artist repeating a well-known artists work, but it depends on how one looks at a particular piece of art. There are quaternate reasons as to why art forgeries can be seen as something positive in the artistic world. Crispin Sartwell discusses almost Jerrold Levinsons definition of art from Levinsons article, Refining Art Historically, in the Journal of esthetics Art Criticism of 1990. To Levinson, art is something that is made to be intended to be regarded as a work of art (Sartwell). Luise Morton and Thomas Foster discuss Nelson Goodmans definition of art from Languages of Art in Journal of aesthetics Art Criticism of 1991.Goodman says that it is about how one looks at an original and a forged art depends on the way we look at it (Morton and Foster). Both Levinson and Goodman start out good points because they are both saying that all depends on the persons perspective. Not everyone sees the same piece of art the same way other person does, so given a choice between an original or a forged piece of art, some may be able to tell the difference and some may not. The supposition of having different perspectives on what is real art or what is not depends solely on an individual.Levinson and Goodman both see art by how the person intends it to be. According to Jonathon Keats who writes in The Daily Beast, art forgery helps take us out of our comfort zone, while the real art keeps us within our comfort zone. Keats writes that forgers credit their work to the original artist. In doing so, the artists work is more accessible to more people and that the artist who forged an original should be appreciated (Keats). Blake Gopnik writing in the new-fashioned York Times says that the forgers can make recreate art with their hands however, great art depends on the idea of the artist.The idea of the forger comes from the original artists, like Pollock and Rothko, setting up procedures and ideas for making art (Gopnik). The forger is able to recreate a work of art because of the way a particular artist wanted their art to be seen. On the other hand, Ross Bowden writing in the Journal of Aesthetics Art Criticism of 1999 about Alfred Lessings establish titled, What Is Wrong with a Forgery? In Lessings essay, he disapproves of art forgery when talking culturally. Lessing believes that forgeries do not have that artistic integrity and lacks creativity.He continues to say that one can recreate an painful artwork, but it wi ll lack the mental imagery it takes to create the original piece of work (Bowden). Forgeries in the eyeshot of Lessing lack imagination and creativity, however, Gopnik and Keats see that an artist has the imagination and creativity to recreate a famous piece of work. If one lacks that imagination and creativity then they would not be able to get away with forgery. These forgery artists are capable of pulling off century old paintings and able to sell them to museums as originals.That takes imagination and creativity. W. E. Kennick brings up in the Journal of Aesthetics Art Criticism of 1985 that every copy of an original piece of work is a forgery. Artists make their work in the style of others, but still make it their own. mavin is not actually forging a real piece of art, much less than copying or imitating that persons style (Kennick). Gopnik also says that Andy Warhols works were sometimes made by him or sometimes made by his assistant. Warhol even attributed some of his wor k to other artists.An artist by the reference of Marcel Duchamp made art out of bicycle wheels, urinals, already made sculptures, and other reusable items. Duchamp further others to do the same and copy his style (Gopnik). Every artist can imitate or copy someone elses work, although that artist who made the original work may no longer be alive, their work is still living on. Art forgeries can be looked at as some smorgasbord of crime because someone is recreating masterpieces and selling them to museums.However, if one stops to think about the fact that art forgeries are actually artists bringing masterpieces back, one would not think it was a crime. These artists are creative enough to be able to recreate an artwork and give art lovers the feeling of having a masterpiece in their fireside or be able to look at it in a museum. Art forgeries are a lucrative past time for those who love art and want to be able to see their art in a museum. It is a win-win situation for both the a rtist and the art lovers.Works CitedBowden, Ross. What is wrong with an art forgery? An anthropological perspective. Journal of Aesthetics Art Criticism (1999) 333-343. Gopnik, Blake. In Praise of Art Forgeries . The New York Times 2 Novemeber 2013. Keats, Jonathon. Why Forgeries Are Great Art. The Daily Beast Kennick, W. E. Art and Inauthenticity. Journal of Aesthetics Art Criticism (1985) 1-12. Morton, Luise H. and Thomas R. Foster. Goodman, Forgery, and the Aesthetic. Journal of Aesthetics Art Criticism (1991) 155-159. Sartwell, Crispin. A Counter-Example to Levinsons Historical conjecture of Art. Journal of Aesthetics Art Criticism (1990) 157-158.